Peace Be With You

I take offense to CATHOLICS (OR ANY religious folk) who throw the word “peace” around as a salutation. Used at the end of their internet posts, their letters and their greeting cards, often in the most hypocritical way. Here’s my response to such a recent use by a upstanding Catholic on the yahoo group Theology and Religion (enjoy):

Peach eh? What is anyone here doing to change anything about the wars and killing that rages and has raged for thousands of years among men? Maybe the total lack of forefront inaction is the refult of having been responsible for the three crusades, which were directly the result of Papal orders?

How about the power of a Billion plus members in the Catholic Church? Where are they? Are they out there making a difference in the current war in Iraq? Anyone? Hello? And then what does the Catholic church and it's Billion members do to stop violence on a global scale? Telvision advertisments? Pro-active rallies? Constant Never ending efforts to halt violence? In fact, what does that figure head pope do about anything in regard to issues of vital importance to humanity except sit on a gazillion dollars in assets while wearing a head dress? Speaking of which I'm sure all those god-fearing Catholics who have more than enough wealth but who nevertless feel vindicated in horading it have this example of leadership to follow! What a fine example this Catholic church provides!

I see what we can do, we can pacify each other with the proverbial "peace" salutation. Peace to you also. It's vital to our souls to be polite because the hundreds of thousands of murdered children in the last three hundred years alone appreciate your ability to invocate peace in some salutation in a Yahoo group. The most insane part of the hypocrisy of the members of this group and the religious in general is that you cant see the utter godlessness in having the support of a billion people who stand by idly offering peace to one another while hundreds of thousands of people (women and children) are murdered in wars each year worldwide.

And how about those other religions and your nonsense about "understanding"...you must live in a shoe box. The insane belief that one religion is superior to another is ONE OF THE PRINCIPLE CAUSES of killing and death and always has been. I see you have quite a plan.

Okay, now stop that the Church AND IT'S BILLION MEMBERS are very active in organizing peaceful anti-war protests, in organizing boycotts against the murderous multi-national corporations that are literally and figuratively raping the environment and people all over the world, in directing Catholics to become peaceful conscientious objectors to violence and killing, in influencing politics and government, in getting the power of that billion people behind making significant changes on a global scale....hold on, sorry one of us has just woke up. No I'm sorry, what religion does so effectively is let murderers invoke god as a means toward their materialistic goals. We're constanlty doing "god's work" - really we are!

Wait there probably is some "resolution" calling for peace in some file in the Vatican so that all the godly Catholics in the world can feel morally relieved of all that guilt for watching television while the golbal murders continue. When a billion people who believe in "peace" can sit by idly and do nothing SIGNICANT to change the world (by the way 1 billion people is about 1/6 the total population and I have not even accounted for other Christian denominations which total more than 2 Billion people or 2/6 the world's population) and offer nothing more than some words (and not action) then I say you take your peace salutation and shove it. And while this is certainly not a peaceful gesture at least it's not hollow and meaningless: it's genuine...

"When war, as in these days in Iraq, threatens the fate of humanity, it is ever more urgent to proclaim, with a strong and decisive voice, that only peace is the road to follow to construct a more just and united society," John Paul II said. "Violence and arms can never resolve the problems of man."

This "decisive" voice that one Billion people fail to hear? I think John Paul was saying "peace", don't you? Thousands of years of colorful garments and polite peaceful salutations and no real results....God Bless You All and Peace Be With You.

Fear, False Hope, the Promise of Security, and the Total Control of America

“Now I want to speak to you of another kind of aggression, aggression without war, where the aggressor comes not as a conqueror but as a champion of peace, of freedom, offering progress and plenty and hope to the unfortunates of the earth” - Richard Nixon on Communism

We must devote special attention to the problems of those on the margins, those lacking adequate food or shelter, those addicted or mentally ill, those whose neighborhoods have been decimated by crime...It's not enough to give them justice. We must also give them hope” - George Bush on the American Poor

Eerily similar and yet totally contradictory these statements express some of the main tactics used by the America Aristocratic government to control the populous. When communist principles threatened the systems used by the wealthy and powerful they used fear to dispel the threat. And while fear (i.e. of communism or terrorism) is their first and most often used method, equally as useful is a much more subtle tactic of control - the installation of false hope.

“If that (criminal) boy...believes he is trapped and worthless and hopeless -- if he believes his life has no value, then other lives have no value to him -- and we are ALL diminished” - Geroge W. Bush

How does a lack of hope diminish us “ALL”? It really doesn’t - the lower classes are already diminished. The reference here is a call to the wealthy to offer the lower classes some “hope” as a means of control. The American Aristocrat and it’s government is bent on one thing - protection and extension of their wealth and power. They continually couch this desire in the precepts of doing good - for the poor, for others, and for the world. But at the heart of every methodology is a means toward helping themselves.

“When they have hope, they will produce, they will be good citizens” - Thailand's Prime Minister, Thaksin Shinawatra July 2003

Essentially instilling hope can quell the resentment of being in an inferior position; or a position of subjugation; or a position of poverty; or a position of social or economic disadvantage; or political oppression. As a tool, it has been used time and time again by the wealthy elite in this world to quell dissent and for the purposes of protectionism against the potential wrath of the lower classes and poor bodies of people in this world. And while they indicate that their desire is to help the lower classes and the poor from their self-destruction, what they really fear is the situation where the lower classes and poor rise up to threaten their positions. These strategies of instilling hope are being used all over the world to keep down the masses - but they have been especially implemented in the United States. In fact, while the talk is always of progress, the actions of the Aristocratic American Government are consistently geared toward maintaining the status quo. What means is best method to establish a sense of hope in people? The first step is the installation of a belief that they are free.

“Advancing freedom and democracy is at the core of helping us win the war on terrorism, because when people have freedom, they have hope...” - George W. Bush

The basic strategy is at the core of the American Capitalist system and involves the use of a capitalist Trojan Horse of fake wealth and a mythical carrot and stick of freedom to anaesthetize the middle and lower classes. Capitalism in the form of advantageous wealth building for the elitist wealth power base and democracy in the form of the election of only wealthy members of society toward their own goals and ends are each devised and used as a means to instill false hope in to the American system of use, misuse and rape of the people. Do we really vote for people who “represent” us? No - we vote for alternating puppets of the American Aristocrat.

"[Crime is deterred]...when people have a stake in society and they have hope." - Arthur Donato, Jr., sociology professor at Villanova University

The middle class and upper middle class and even the wealthy are placated with a stake in society. The beauty of the American Aristocratic manipulation is that any stake will do. From simple hope in an ability to obtain some economic prominence, to actual wealth, to false wealth predicated on debt, the spectrum of classes is covered. On the very lower rung of social classes, where the lack of any advantages leaves citizens unable to make moral choices, the tools of control (prison) and elimination (the death penalty) are ultimately used. And as a tool the focus remains firmly on simple control or elimination without any regard to the soul of a man. Nor the fact that his particular situation was in part contributed to by the polices of the Aristocratic American who seek only to protect their positions. In order to steer people away from the actual consequences of the American system as implemented by this force, and to maintain the continual ruling of this country by a few wealthy and their power base, secondary tools are used. These include the Blame Game in which failures of the lower classes to over-come their predicaments is used blame the people themselves. This in effect distracts the lower classes from the true causes of their condition to some alleged “opportunity” they have to become somebody. The propaganda of the wealthy includes the use of labels such as “lazy”, “uneducated”, and “dysfunctional”. Of course what this blame fails to take in to account is ADVANTAGE. How much easier is it for a person who has some or many advantages to improve or maintain? And while there are exceptions, for the very depleted lower class these are often more the product of luck chance and circumstance than bona fide effort.

With the majority of Americans either content to live on a faux (debt filled) wealth system which only serves to the benefit of their masters, or with sufficient wealth, the powers that could incite change are adequately subdued. Clearly the lower classes, the poor, the uneducated, the people with the fewest connections, with the least reliability and with the least credibility do not pose a real political threat in relation to the American Aristocratic position. The middle class and upper middle class are content to empower the same people who will keep their existence safe. The fat cow sees no benefit to charging the farmer.

“Where there is suffering, there is duty. Americans in need are...priorities. And all of us are diminished when any are hopeless” - George W. Bush

Consequently, the only threat that the lower American classes could pose is physical. The physical threat of violence, the physical threat of theft. Nevertheless, providing basic subsistence to the lower classes is an essential part of controlling the populous. One of the most concealed tools of the wealthy (and especially those who label themselves liberals and democrats) which is used to lull the American lower classes in to complacency is the welfare system. The beauty of welfare is that while it gives the air of compassion and sharing, what it essentially does is disempower people in to a state of perpetual inaction. It is a further form of slavery in that it leads to a generational mind-set which permits the acceptable use of welfare as a means of subsistence at a level which is just sufficient enough to prevent the loss of “hope” that is required to contain the poorer populous in to inaction.

“The proletariat of the world has but one enemy, the capitalist class...We must refuse to put into the hands of this enemy an armed force even under the guise of a democratic army...” - Republican Party Platform of 1916

And now that they have the money and the power they also have the military and police. How long will it be before they turn them on us to take final control of the system? Final control of America? Who will remain wealthy and who will remain in power? And how will they do it?

Capitalism's ability to permit upward mobility acts in the same way that false hope does - it creates a stake. And just like the stake many have in false hope, the stake is illusionary. In the end, the only non-illusionary wealth is the power. In America seizing power has been a peaceful and unobtrusive process. Permitted by the consolidation of wealth which was then used to exclude the middle and lower classes from real and effective representation. As the laws which were once paramount to freedom become more limited to the current leaders, the only conclusion we can make is one in which the hyper-wealthy will ultimately maintain the wealth in another form. In other words, in a system where money has no real value, power and control will ultimately be the only non-illusionary wealth that there is.

So what? So what if we are in fact ruled by an elite group of billionaires who control the flow of money, the interest rates, the economy? A group who have consolidated tremendous wealth and access and control and political power? Who put their interest above and beyond the people of this land? “So what” you say? In 2007, one-out-of every 200 people Americans is a millionaire and it's expected that one-out-of-10 people will be millionaires within the next decade. Are all of these so called millionaires going for the ride? Are they going to share the power? Of course not. You millionaires need to pay attention at this point to truly understand the possibilities. And to help you see the possibilities I ask you some simple questions:

(1) If the dollar and the economy collapses what will your wealth really be worth?

(2) What will be valuable if the dollar and the economy collapses?

(3) Who keeps pumping fiat money in to the economy and accumulating debt in the name of our Nation and why?

(4) Where does you food come from? Do you have a farm?

(5) Could you farm and real estate be taken by your governemnt?

I’ll answer these for you: Force, control and power will be the only wealth. But even force without the "color of law" is devoid of authority so we give you the latest line up of written powers provided by your governemt:

# EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990 allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.

# EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communication media.

# EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.

# EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 allows the government to seize all means of transportation, including personal cars, trucks or vehicles of any kind and total control over all highways, seaports, and waterways.

# EXECUTIVE ORDER 10999 allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.

# EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.

# EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.

# EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.

# EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003 allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.

# EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.

# EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.

# EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.

# EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.

# EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period.

# EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency.

"I see in the near future a crisis approaching. It unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. The money powers prays upon the nation in times of peace and conspires against it in times of adversity. It denounces, as public enemies, all who question its methods or throw light upon its crimes. Corporations have been enthroned, and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until the wealth is aggregated in the hands of a few, and the Republic is destroyed." - Abraham Lincoln (1864)

The “so what” is more than just some moral precept of fairness; of what is right and wrong. Because while what is right and wrong is paramount to me and many Americans, what is more paramount is the survival of America as a nation in which we live as free people and not economic slaves. The American people are safe and shortsighted to the fact that their safety has now been placed in the hands of a wealthy Elite which meets openly to discuss the best possible means of enslaving the world. But go back to sleep America and until you have been enslaved, remember what pappa Bush says:

“To kids in our cities, don't give up hope. Say no to drugs; stay in school. And, yes, Keep hope alive" - George H. W. Bush

The American Aristocrats And Their Future Plans

“The brilliance of the American aristocracy is they’ve convinced the world they don’t exist... It’s safer that way. Unlike us [the old European aristocracy], they’re invisible targets...It’s very clever -- you teach them in America anyone can become rich, so that when they hate the rich, they hate themselves. It paralyzes them. All they can do is eat.” - Dirk Wittenborn, Fierce People

I’ve written prior blogs on the values of conservatives. But in retrospect it seems conservatives is too broad a category. So in order to exemplify where these amoral values arise from, I want you for a moment to put yourself in the position of a person with untold wealth. A person whose existence and whose family’s existence is among the most pampered and luxurious on the planet. Whose way of life is free of hassle and unrestricted. Whose subsistence is not predicated on daily work but rather is secured by untold wealth. If you are such a person, your primary values might encompass your desire to protect your position of wealth. If you are so inclined and also equally devoid of principles of self-sacrifice and morality, your means of maintenance and protection of your wealth is unrestricted. That is to say, you can kill thousands, even millions provided your wealth is sustained. You can enslave a populous as long as your position is unaffected. Would or could the American Aristocrat assassinate someone in their way? Would or could they rig an election? Would or could they commit horrendous crimes against humanity? And as I’ve noted previously, it goes without saying that people who hoard inexplicable levels of wealth are inherently immoral. Not to mention that history has shown us that the god of mammon has no bounds.

Clearly, the first step to the protection of your wealth is to obtain power. For it is in the maintenance of power that you can dictate the world around you toward the protection of your wealth. When we inquire as to why the wealthy are so enthraled with political life, why a billionaire would run for mayor, why the most affluent Americans seek the white house, why the wealthy contribute to political campaigns, we must look exclusively to the protection of wealth. For it is through political power that the wealthy American Aristocrats have command over a vast military force and access to the intelligence of the nation. It is through political power that these wealthy American Aristocrats can avoid, manipulate and create law toward the further protection of their wealth and positions of power. It is through political power that these wealthy American Aristocrats can manipulate the systems of agriculture, manufacturing and government toward the creation and sustenance of their wealth. But power is not only a means to an end but also a means in itself. For once you have adequately filled these positions of power (either individually or vis-a-vis a puppet presence) your secondary goal now becomes the maintenance of these positions of power. The maintenance of the presidential seat; the maintenance of judges in positions of power who can eliminate the checks and balances our forefathers desired; military commanders who will fall in line; the manipulation of congress toward your agenda. It seems to reason that the means available to maintain power for a moral-less human are limitless and would include murder, manipulation, black mail, and even genocide. To the use of people and their lives like pawns in a game of chess: used for a time to increase the wealth and power of the Kings and Queens and then sacrificed when their usefulness dissipates.

Therefore, in any accurate assessment of the actions of our American government (now and in a historical context since execution of JFK) we must look first and foremost to their exclusive underlying motivations - the protection of both their wealth and their positions of power. We must understand that any explanation they offer for some action or some behavior other than these is a product of pure fiction. Any alleged higher purpose, any alleged affiliation by way of statesmanship or allegiance to country, any concept of some threat which you must be protected against, any indication of the common good or the higher purpose of men, are fictional tools toward covering up their underlying goals. It may not have always been this way. But in the current leadership, it seems inalienable. In fact, any explanations other than those which can clearly be linked back to protectionism must also be reviewed in a secondary way - it’s intermediary purpose. What is the purpose of the statement or action toward the ultimate goal? Is the statement or action intended to create some response toward the ultimate goal? Is the statement or action made to create some mind set toward the ultimate goal? Is the statement made to cause some action or lack of action toward the ultimate goal? So while the ultimate identifier of the action or statement must be the simple revision of the real goals, when they are unclear the secondary intermediary purpose of these statements or actions must be ascertained in relation to those goals. They must be examined in the context of the ultimate purpose: the maintenance and health of the wealth and power of the American Aristocrat.

Sadly, these American Aristocrats are well versed in human behavior and are familiar with the human condition. They understand that allegiance to some pack is more powerful than the truth. And (aside from placation vis-a-vis subsistence) one of the greatest single tools of manipulation has been their call to some sense of community and allegiance to some group of people toward a common goal. The waving of the American flag, the constant reiteration of the ideal of freedom, the illusionary democratic elections of other wealthy American Aristocrats, the call to stand strong for your country - all fronts for their maintenance of wealth and power. And while the significance of this call is not lost in both the political and religious realm of control, the American Aristocrat also understands the equally effective tool of fear. The power of increasing the punishment for criminal behavior or civil disobedience; the fear of potential punishment for the threats made against the American Aristocratic government and it’s self-serving actions; the historical threat of some created outside force which we require protection from; continual laws created for purposes of narrower and narrower control via fear. Mixed in among their various methods of non-coercive-control is the fear of god. But when fear fails to quell the human desire to be free, and the break-down of some allegiance to a common cause becomes weakened, and when survival itself is in real and imminent danger, in times of such a crisis the only remaining tool left for the American Aristocratic government will be the establishment of forceful control and elimination of the populous. What could cause such a crisis? There are a number of likely candidates. We can begin with the laundry list of disputed potential often discredited and “wacky” causes: things like global warming, peak oil (energy shportages), the collapse of the dollar and the American economy, food shortages (especially in the wake of energy shortages), and population expansion (in light of diminishing resources). Any one of these items could potentially cause civil unrest and anarchy as food shortages and lack of subsistence become prominent in America. And if such a scenario were to occur, the first people the American public would seek relief from are the people who hold the means of subsistence. The people who have established the bunkers under ground; the people who control the enormous military machine they have built off the backs of the American people; the people who have access to what remains of the wealth of the county; the people who have the technology and the reserves to attempt to maintain their positions of power and wealth - or even their survival; the American Aristocrat and the American Aristocratic government. If any one of these “wacky” things were actually to occur we would need only ask the question: Does anyone honestly believe that the American Aristocrat would relinquish it’s wealth and power in the face of some national or global calamity? Or share the remaining wealth with the populous? Clearly the answer is no. Never-the-less is there some proof that the American Aristocratic government is currently actually concerned that some “wacky” thing like the dollar collapse could turn in to the destruction (or diminution) of their positions of wealth and power? Is it possible that the American Aristocrat is fearful of the potential backlash from an American middle class whose is accustomed to food and basic subsistence at levels which are beyond adequate? In order to answer these questions we need to first look at what potential plans the American Aristocrat could conjure up to combat such a scenario. Or perhaps what plan they could implement to extinguish a known future crisis. We have to hypothesize the possible ideas they pass around with their wealthy cohorts from around the world at the Bilderberger meetings. What pamphlets they pass out at Trilateral Commission meetings. What plans they discussed at Bohemian Grove. We must ask the question: If I had all the money and power what plans would I have in the event of a melt-down? What planning would I be acting upon in advance of a likely or anticipated crisis? Once we answer these questions we must look to the statements and actions of the American Aristocrat and it’s government and ascertain whether there are signs that these plans are in fact being implemented.

The simplest solution to maintaining their positions will be forceful control; both in the actual confinement of people and in the use of people for the maintenance of their positions. Forced labor and confinement (by use of the military and police forces) is the most basic and easiest implemented plan. This will essentially mark a shift in American history from non-coercive control to forceful control. But such a plan would seem to be unlikely on a national level. Look at the result of hurricane Katrina. The basic inability to control the area (or lack of an attempt to do so) indicates that total national control would be impossible. Even implementation of the American military would make such a scenario unlikely as sufficient resources to control a country the size of America are lacking. The plan would most likely involve a requested control (submission) with the presence of local police forces and national guard troops in conjunction with total actual military control of selected areas. And finally followed by abandonment and the elimination of a significant portion of the populous. Ultimately, submission being a pretext to abandonment under which much of the country will be left to die off as it annihilates itself under the pressure of decreasing and diminished resources, sickness and violence. Since this is the easiest plan to enact, we’ll start with an examination of this possibility. Essentially a three stage plan of (1) national control via submission and the use of local police forces and national guard forces followed by (or in conjunction with) (2) the total military control of selective areas of America and ultimately (3) abandonment and destruction of the exterior population at it’s own hands or possibly via biological warfare.

To begin we must understand the potential problems of control in times of significant crisis - even on a limited basis. You the wealthy American Aristocrat will undoubtedly be faced with a number of problems if such an event does occur. The first problem you will face in implementing control by submission is the American Constitution. That’s right, the document which professes to confer the right of American citizens in times of peace and in times of crisis NOT TO BE CONTROLLED WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW and which permits FREE ASSEMBLY possess the most significant obstacle to your initial ability to establish a peaceful (yet) forceful control. Certainly, there will be rouge elements which will interfere with your plans. American citizens who might seek to organize themselves and obtain some semblance of power or a threat. The constitution has been a powerful document geared toward stopping you and it will require significant weakening in order for this forceful control to be effectuated. Local police and national guard troops must have an initial ability to forcibly control members or groups of people while the remaining population is thrust in to fear of a similar fate or lulled by a false sense of security. A means to prevent any organization or mobilization of people when resources might be initially available. When these areas of abandonment realize that they have in fact been abandoned, the must be in a state of non-recovery such that it will be too late for them to act. So you will initially require some semblance of order and in order to establish that initial order under martial law you the wealthy American Aristocrat will need to make sure that you have already abolished basic rights which could stand in your way. Perhaps the creation of laws which will permit the easy detention of American citizens who try to assemble peacefully? Perhaps the elimination of court access for violations of basic human rights?

The second impediment to submissive control is the United States congress. For while the congress is in fact a micro-representation of the American Aristocrat, there is a potential for a power struggle which must be eliminated. You the American Aristocrat can not risk the possibility of some moral dilemma arising from the ranks of congress. From some attempt by a few hundred men to re-insert principles of fairness and morality in to your plan to maintain your wealth and power. You can not risk congress inciting the American people to action by some dissident voice. Your ability to by-pass the congress will therefore be essential to ensure that the American sheep will not sense any dissent in the implementation of initial control. Your power can not be called in to question such that post-crisis initial plans are somehow thwarted. Another problem involves scale. Man’s basic survival instinct is tremendous. Picture if you will hoards (millions) of people unable to eat and you see tremendous potential for an attack on the remaining resources. You either have to eliminate this attack or (in some or multiple ways) diminish it’s potential. False hope in the initial stages will be necessary. “Help is on the way” will fill the airwaves as you hunker yourself down in to the bunkers. The quiet quenching of the American citizen’s will, while you wait for disease, the lack of food and supplies and medical attention to take effect and devastate a nation (and perhaps the world?).

Finally, you must prior to any crisis be able to work in clear and plain sight of the populous without giving them enough to go on. That is to say, you must prepare for their demise while maintaining an air of normalcy. You must at all times prevent panic which would thwart your preparation, or worse result in some power base which could potentially threaten you position before your plans were implemented. You must be able to change the laws and limit the rights of the American citizen so that your plan can have it’s desired effect. How do you prepare in advance for imminent civil unrest without arousing suspicions? How do you conduct national exercises aimed at quelling civil unrest without causing an uproar (and the civil unrest in advance)? How do you remove political rights of a people without a collective outrage. We can get detailed here but for now I’ll note that you start by controlling the media and ultimately the means of communication. By discrediting any allegation of anyone who could provoke some thought regarding your methods and plans. Labels like lunatic and traitor come to mind. You must certainly create some other reason for all of your preparatory action. Some lie which will be believable enough that those sleeping American citizens will remain asleep just long enough for you to take the necessary preparatory steps set your plan in motion. Perhaps the threat of some outside force? Perhaps an allegation that everything is being done FOR YOUR BENEFIT?

Now for the meat of this discussion. You already know the answers to the above questions. You already know that the cold war, communism, and now terrorism have been used to create and build military might. That some fake concept of a terrorist threat is now being used to limit your rights as an America citizen. If you don’t know do some independent research in to the following: Patriot Act of 2001 (extended in 2005); the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (which allows for the suspension of habeas corpus and the practice of torture and rendition); the John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007 (which facilitates the declaration of martial law and nullifies posse comitatus by allowing the President to station troops anywhere in the country and to commandeer the National Guard without the consent of local authorities); and, finally, the National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive, signed on May 9, 2007, which in the event of a catastrophe would place all governmental authority in the hands of the President. You also already know that the government under the guise of terrorist acts has been practicing martial law. If you don’t know, do some independent research on these upcoming events: United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM) has announced plans for an anti-terrorism exercise called Vigilant Shield 08. The exercise which is slated to run from October 15th to October 20th is described as a way to prepare, prevent and respond to any number of national crises.

See also, from the Department of Homeland Security Web site:

(http://www.dhs.gov/xprepresp/training/gc_1179430526487.shtm): “October 15-24, 2007, the TOPOFF 4 Full-Scale Exercise (T4 FSE) will feature thousands of Federal, State, territorial, and local officials. These officials will engage in various activities as part of a robust, full-scale simulated response to a multi-faceted threat. The exercise will address policy and strategic issues that mobilize prevention and response systems, require participants to make difficult decisions, carry out essential functions, and challenge their ability to maintain a common operating picture during an incident of national significance” I’m wondering what these difficult decisions will be?

For centuries the American Aristocrat has used and manipulated capitalism toward creation of their wealth and power. Billions of dollars spent on defense in the name of some horrendous outside threat that never materializes. Communism, Vietnam, the cold war, and now the threat of terrorism. The creation of the department of defense, the CIA, the NSA, the FBI, FEEMA, the Department of Homeland Security, all in the name of protecting you. But has this been or is this the real the goal of these agencies? Or was their creation a means for the American Aristocrat to ultimately create and then control a diverse body of intelligence and force to maintain their own power and wealth? Organizations truly aimed ultimately at the elimination of threats to their wealth and power. Or maybe to be used as future tools against the serfs of the land. The snake fed for 100 years so that it could eat it’s own tail. The dollar a hollow tool of the wealthy to enslave and then destroy the people. And now, in times of potential food shortages, energy shortages, rising temperatures, and population explosion, it seems the time may be ripe for the snake to feast.

It is not hard to retroactively find fault with a civilization who by it’s own selfish desire to build and maintain wealth sent an entire global population down the road to disaster. Whose systems of capitalism established the concentration of wealth in the few and an acceptable way of life for the many. Of an American Aristocratic government that sold it’s people down the river. That failed to develop alternative fuels but instead for profit sucked the blood out of every last drop of oil. That created worthless fiat money and unparallel debt. Perhaps in the heart and souls of some American Aristocrats there is some godly desire to establish some viable plan for the survival of mankind and for America. Alternatively, perhaps the plan is and has always been to use and suck the life out of the middle and lower classes, to brainwash the patriot in to silence, to create an impenetrable military force for personal use, all as a means to create and protect their wealth and power? In either event it seems certain that plans have been implemented to selectively protect the American Aristocrat’s survival. The question then becomes: what are we the American People going to do about it?

Relgion's Origins

Judaism was an offshoot of the Egyptian religious beliefs. Moses was an Egyptian and when the Israelites rejected his attempts to explain his beliefs they sent him off for 40 years. When he returned, he demised a way to introduce those beliefs - he created concepts that taught his traditions without the complexities. He introduced the concept of one god and law to a lawless people. And he used alleged miracles and fear as a means to invoke beliefs. At some point down the line, there was an exclusion from the Egyptian teachings by way of the Tribe of Levi - an attempt to dominate god with specific exclusionary laws. There was also a misue of the law by a re-codification with political goals that had nothing to do with the original concepts. For the people who still understood the origins of the Jewish faith they devised a way to open the "covenant" to all people. And reintroduce the Egyptian ideas in another form. So Christianity is really just an new reincarnation of Egyptian paganism. All of these noble attempts to create moral understanding has lead to so much conflict it's unimaginable. And certainly unimaginable to the people whose earliest attempts were simply to establish morality and things like sacrifice in to a lawless people. So the precepts of Judaism and Christianity (and Mohamed) are in line with noble attempts to encompass all of humanity in to the understanding that there is one source which can permit us to overcome our conditions here and now and live in an eternal fashion upon death. It is by misuse, misunderstanding, and human inclinations that religions results in an opposite polar focus.